The Loony Files
1. "Two relatives of Eminem have filed suit against the rap star, claiming that he is trying to evict them from the home he had built for them . . . According to the lawsuit, the Schmitts claim that Eminem had agreed to pay them $100,000 a year for five years and provide them with a house worth up to $350,000. But they say the rapper has given them only $165,000 since 2002."
Wow. He "only" provided them with $165,000 in 3 years -- and he bought a lot and built them a $350,000 home, and now they're suing him! Un-frickin-believable. They're angry that he kept the home and the land under his own name, and now he's sent them an eviction notice telling them to get out of the house, but I wonder what they did to deserve it? You know -- they probably bitched at him about his not giving them enough money ("Give us more money! We're out of champagne!"), and they probably threatened to sell stories about him to the tabloids if he didn't pay up ("We know secrets!").
I'm not a big fan of Eminem, and I thought his attempt to influence the 2004 election against George Bush was genuinely lame (though even dorkier were the people who were convinced he could make a political dent), but I think this is a lousy thing to have happen to anybody, and I can hardly believe that after he's been so generous with his aunt and uncle, they would turn around and sue him just to wring more money and a house out of him. Because, you know, I'm sure they feel like they're entitled to it . . .
2. "Actress Margot Kidder became a U.S. citizen Wednesday to avoid possible deportation to her native Canada when she begins protesting the war in Iraq, she said."
Now that's just foolish talk. No one is being deported from the United States for expressing their political views (maybe for inciting violence, but not for their opposition to a war or to a Presidential candidate), and making such a statement to the press is not only ridiculous, but downright ignorant.
She goes on to say "that her sole motivation" for becoming a U.S. citizen was to protest the war in Iraq. She doesn't care about living in this country, she just wants to "vote against anyone and everyone in elected office that in any way supported the Bush administration."
I think this helps explain the wackiness a little: "In 1996 she made headlines when she was discovered in a delusional state in a Los Angeles neighborhood (she was described as "dirty, frightened and paranoid"). She later described publicly her battles with manic depression."
Perhaps she should think about upping the meds -- the paranoia sounds like it's on a comeback.
3. "Incidents of consumer anger and gas-station crime have made headlines across the country, including the killing of a gas station owner in Alabama last week by a driver attempting to steal $52 worth of gas . . . Rae Dougher, manager of energy market issues at the Washington-based American Petroleum Institute, noted that, although gas prices are soaring, gas station owners are often suffering squeezed profits or even losing money -- and they still have to deal with irritated customers who blame them for high costs."
Hey, news flash for the brain challenged -- it aint the retailers you should be yelling at. Oil companies are taking in huge amounts of cash at present, since they bought their oil on futures, which means they're paying for it at $20-$40 dollars a barrel instead of the present $67. But the market is jittery, domestic refinement capacity has been hamstrung by environmental regulations (which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it means that we rely even more on foreign oil than we by all rights need to) and the oil companies are nervously looking ahead to a future where they'll have to shell out billions for alternative energy technologies, deal with potential disruptions in delivery from both natural and political causes, face competition for supplies from growing economies such as China and India, and purchase more reserves at $70 a barrel and up (as oil prices are not likely to head south anytime soon).
Larry Kudlow at the NRO writes: "The spread of global capitalism to places like China, India, and Eastern Europe is the main cause of the spike in energy prices. It’s a market signal that the new and prospering world economy needs more power. Consequently, this is not a recessionary supply crunch like we had in the 1970s. It’s a growth-oriented demand increase," . . . and a situation which he believes will instigate an energy market explosion in the near future as nuclear power plants come online and alternative energy sources are more thoroughly explored and implemented.
Meanwhile, "nationwide, gas thefts cost convenience stores an estimated $237 million -- or about $2,141 a store --in 2004, the National Association of Convenience Stores report . . . Executive Vice President and Director of the Petroleum and Convenience Marketers of Alabama, Arleen Alexander, states: “A lot of people think when they are doing this (driving off without paying for their gas) they are hurting the oil companies, like the Exxons and the Texacos, but they are not. They are hurting the small business man who is making just pennies a gallon right now.”
So stop bitching at the gas station employess, dammit!
4. Oh, and the Italians . . . *sigh* (but they make great wine!).
UPDATE:
I almost forgot the academic liberals, but Instapundit didn't when he linked to the spine-tingling article, "Proving the Critic's Case" by By KC Johnson, regarding the near complete lack of intellectual diversity at America's universities.
There are numerous chilling quotations from University Professors and Administration throughout the article, but I think my favorite was this: "According to Montclair State’s Grover Furr, “colleges and universities do not need a single additional ‘conservative’ .... What they do need, and would much benefit from, is more Marxists, radicals, leftists — all terms conventionally applied to those who fight against exploitation, racism, sexism, and capitalism. We can never have too many of these, just as we can never have too few ‘conservatives.'"
Right . . . more Marxists, radicals and leftists. That's just what we all need.
UPDATE 2:
Dan Savage, ex-Drag Queen and present pseudo-moderate, takes his place in the Loony Files for self-righteous claptrap like this: "Gay people are more likely to take extreme ill-advised sexual risks . . . I would add voting Republican when you're gay to that list, along with doing crystal meth and having sex with 40 guys in one weekend. They're both dumbass, self-destructive things to do. A certain number of people are stupid enough to off themselves."
*Yawn* . . . yet another gay lefty obediently regurgitates "The Republo-Fascist-Theocracy Will Kill Us All!" rhetoric. Good little doggy, Dan. Here's your Don't Ask, Don't Tell biscuit.



Comments
Dude, if I hadn't already heard Michael Medved interview wacky "Grover Furr" before I would've thought you were making that up.
He's real folks. A real pain in the ass...
Posted by: Scott | August 26, 2005 6:59 PM
You know, I used to work in a gas station (not an entirely UNpleasant time, but not my best years), and I can tell you from personal experience what even the largest convenience store chains charge for gas. If we were charging $1.219 (a few years back), then we probably paid $1.19 a gallon for it. That was even if we made a profit, though, because there were lots of times we had to sell it at a loss to get customers to come in the store at all (usually the loss was $0.05 a gallon to make sure the small guy up the road was undercut). When you sell about 15,000 gallons a week, that adds up to a potential profit disaster really quickly. THAT'S why the stuff inside the store is so expensive. Without the $6.00 bottle of aspirin, there wouldn't be as many gas stations, and we'd probably be paying more for gas than we are currently.
One of the few things that the store did that I liked was that every time the price of gas shot up, or the tax on cigarettes tripled (eek!), then they posted signs explaining why the prices went up. That way, when the 5,000th person that day bitches me out for the price of stuff, I could point to the sign (it got really old explaining world politics to people who refused to read a newspaper or watch the news). Not that it made a HUGE difference, because then they'd bitch at me about politics. Sometimes you just can't win for losing...
Posted by: Phillip | August 27, 2005 9:46 AM
Check the web, but I vaguely recall that the backstory on Eminem was that he had persuaded his aunt and uncle to pull up stakes and relocate (uncle left his job) to keep the lonely rapper company, and that that $350K house you say "he built for them" is the same house from which he is now trying to evict them. Sorta puts their complaint in a different light.
_______________
Homocon sez:
"To keep the lonely rapper company" . . . ? And because he built a house and let them live in it, he now somehow "owes" it to them?
Talk about an entitlement culture.
It's beyond low that they're suing him for cash and a house they didn't purchase, build or own. Poor auntie and uncle, "pulling up stakes" for lonely little Eminem, only to be treated to less than 100k a year. *sniffle*
Posted by: hc | August 27, 2005 11:52 AM
Homocon, that Eminem story has got to be the panultimate in poetic political justice: Dude spends most of his career touting the agenda of the socialist-collectivists in song and offstage, and its entitlement mentality comes back to bite him via his own gimmee relations.
LMAO!
_____________________
Homocon sez:
I hadn't thought of it that way . . . (*visibly brightens*)
Posted by: Ted | August 29, 2005 3:15 AM